Page 12 - eBook_Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Manufacturing V1
P. 12

Figure 17: Flow Chart Processing for Model 2          62
               Figure 18: Scatter Plot between Actual vs.
                         Predicted Demand                            62
               Figure 19: Line Plot between Actual vs.
                         Predicted Demand                            63
               Figure 20: Scatter Plot  between Actual vs Predicted &
                         Number Products Sold                        63
               Figure 21: Flow Chart Processing for Model 3          64
               Figure 22: Scatter Plot between Actual vs
                         Predicted Demand                            65
               Figure 23: Line Plot between Actual vs. Predicted
                         Demand Predicted Demand                     65
               Figure 24: Scatter Plot between Actual vs Predicted
                         Number of Products Sold                     66
               Figure 25: Flow Chart Processing for Model 4          67
               Figure 26: Scatter Plot Between Actual vs
                         Predicted Demand                            67
               Figure 27: Flow Chart Processing for Model 5          68
               Figure 28: Scatter Plot between Actual vs.
                         Predicted Demand                            69
               Figure 29: Line Plot between Actual vs.
                         Predicted Demand                            69
               Figure 30: ML Model Accuracy Results                  70
               Figure 31: Methodology for Device Prototyping         83
               Figure 32: CAD Model of Prototype’s Structure         85
               Figure 33: Schematic circuit diagram of actuator
                         controlling unit                            87
               Figure 34: Code Algorithm Flowchart                   88
               Figure 35: Assembly process chart of device           89
               Figure 36: Final Prototype                            89
               Figure 37: A sample being tested with 3D surface
                         profile device                              90
               Figure 38: Results of different surface parameters    91
               Figure 39: Comparison graphs to evaluate accuracy
                         of the system                               93









                                              x
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17