Page 14 - eBook_Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Manufacturing V2
P. 14

Figure 41: Microstructures of the initial and radial-forged
                         AISI 1010 steel bar: (a) initial microstructure,
                         (b & c) edge position after radial forging, (d &
                         e) centre position after radial forging     90
               Figure 42: Region-Wide  Increase in  Winter (Blue),
                         Summer (Red), and Annual (Yellow) Mean      101
               Figure 43: Solar Energy Potential in Pakistan         102
               Figure 44: Smart flower PV system, (a) In closed state (b)
                         In open state                               106
               Figure 45: Flow Chart of  the Design and Experimental
                         Evaluation of Solar  Tracker Based Smart
                         Flower PV Panels                            110
               Figure 46: Block Diagram of the “Design and
                         Experimental Evaluation of Solar  Tracker
                         Based Smart Flower PV Panels System”        111
               Figure 47: Power out combined with angle tracking     113
               Figure 48: Tracker static panel comparison            113
               Figure 49: Rochelle salt                              120
               Figure 50: Aluminium tape                             120
               Figure 51: Fabrication process of  Aluminium-Rochelle
                         Salt thin film                              121
               Figure 52: d33 Coefficient Meter                      122
               Figure 53: Tapping testing                            123
               Figure 54: Impact hammer testing                      124
               Figure 55: Testing setup                              124
               Figure 56: Measurement   of   the   d₃₃   piezoelectric
                         coefficient using a d₃₃ meter setup         125
               Figure 57: Tap test evaluation of the Rochelle salt-based
                         piezoelectric device                        126
               Figure 58: Testing of  the piezoelectric device using the
                         impact hammer method                        127














                                              xii
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19