Page 26 - eBook_Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Manufacturing V1
P. 26

Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Manufacturing –
                                         Volume 1

                  Despite the small magnitude of change, a non-linear increase
               in pH difference percentage was observed over time, particularly
               for  the Cube  samples, which exhibited the highest  overall  pH
               increase (4.60%) by Day 28.

                  This  suggests a gradual accumulation  of degradation
               byproducts, such as acidic oligomers and monomers (including
               lactic acid, the primary hydrolysis product of PLA), which can
               lower the local pH and alter the surrounding microenvironment
               during the degradation process  (Elsawy, Kim, Park & Deep,
               2017).

                      5 4                             3.9642   4.6036
                    pH Difference Percentage (%)  3.5 3 2  2.3047 2.0408 2.9449 2.7167  2.9793  3.0968
                     4.5
                                                               3.3722


                     2.5
                                                          2.9412
                                                  2.4051
                     1.5

                     0.5
                      0 1    0 0 0       1.9305
                           Day 0    Day 7    Day 14   Day 21   Day 28
                                           Time Interval

                                  Cube      Dogbone      Bar

               Figure 4: pH difference percentage of Cube, Dogbone and Bar PLA
                        samples over a 28-day immersion period in SBF.

                  In comparison, Dogbone and Bar samples showed lower final
               pH  variations,  peaking  at 3.37%  and  3.10%,  respectively.
               Although the ranking in pH variation differs, these trends loosely
               correlate with the weight  loss  results, with  the Cube samples
               showing the highest increase despite exhibiting the lowest weight
               loss.  This  inconsistency implies that pH change is not solely
               dependent on weight degradation, but also possibly influenced by
               localised surface degradation and sample geometry affecting the
               interaction with the surrounding medium.




                                              10
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31