Page 59 - eBook_Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Manufacturing V1
P. 59

Evaluating Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) and Blockboard as Enclosure
                           Materials for Ambient Stability in FDM Printing

               that likely minimises material  deformation and  enhances
               interlayer adhesion. In the final stage of the experiment, just
               before the 200-minute mark, the observed drop in ambient
               temperature is likely due to the cooling sequence triggered by the
               3D printer after completing its print cycle.

                  As primary heat sources, such as the heated bed and extruder,
               begin shutting down, the internal  temperature of the enclosure
               naturally declines.  This downward  trend  aligns with expected
               thermal behaviour following the end of active printing, rather than
               pointing to any shortcomings in the enclosure’s insulating
               capabilities.  Therefore, the  temperature  decrease  during  this
               period should be seen as a normal consequence of reduced internal
               heat generation, not as evidence of poor thermal retention.

               Comparative Analysis of Ambient Temperature Profiles in
               PMMA and Blockboard

               Maintaining a stable ambient temperature during the 3D printing
               process is critical for achieving  high-quality  results especially
               when working with materials like Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene
               (ABS), which are particularly sensitive to thermal fluctuations.
               Even slight changes in temperature can  lead to issues such as
               warping, cracking, or weak layer adhesion.  To  address  this,
               enclosures are often used to help regulate the temperature around
               the  printed object. In this study, we compared  two printing
               environments: a PMMA enclosure, and  a blockboard enclosure.
               The goal was  to evaluate how each configuration  influences
               ambient temperature over a 200-minute FDM print cycle. Figure
               10 presents the ambient temperature profiles for all three setups.


















                                              43
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64