Page 30 - eBook_Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Manufacturing V2
P. 30

Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Manufacturing –
                                         Volume 2

                  For case (d), a thin surface bottle divided into 100 sections was
               imported to Ansys from SolidWorks and unstructured tetrahedral
               mesh was generated. A grid independency test was executed at
               initial thickness of 1.17 mm, and same element size was then used
               to conduct thickness variation analysis through parametric study.

               Methodology for Machine Learning

               In this section, the application of ML is integrated to predict the
               mechanical behaviour of HDPE lubricant bottle under the stacking
               condition. This study focuses on two structural parameters’ i.e.
               bottle’s deformation and von  Mises  stress resulting from
               variations in bottle thickness across 100 points.
               Therefore, Regression, a supervised machine learning technique
               is utilised because of label input and output data. By employing
               parametric study in finite element analysis, a dataset was extracted
               which consists of 100 input features and two output features, as
               detailed in Table 3, exploring the influence of thickness variation
               on the overall weight of bottle.

                  As illustrated previously in Figure 2, the workflow began with
               importing the dataset into Jupiter Notebook, followed by (80:20)
               split into training and  testing dataset, as previously done by
               Demircioğlu, Bakır & Çakır (2024). Based on prior studies in the
               field of non-linear finite element analysis (Nath, Ankit, Neog &
               Gautam, 2024; Hussain, Sakhaei & Shafiee, 2024; Pranckevičius
               & Marcinkevičius, 2017; Kadiyala & Kumar, 2018), different ML
               algorithms,  such as support vector  regressor (SVR),  bagging
               regression, decision  tree,  forest  tree, and boost  gradient,  were
               individually used to develop the hypothesis using the identical
               training dataset. The test set was then used to predict the output
               features and evaluate model accuracy by comparing the predicted
               and actual values using standards performance  parameters.
               Models’ performance was assessed using Mean Square Error
               (MSE) and R-square (R2) score. MSE  indicates how far the
               model’s predictions are from the true values. Lower MSE means
               better predictions. R2 score is a statistical error that measures how
               well a model fits. The value of R2 score varies between 0 and 1;
               however, the closer the value of it to 1, the better the model fits




                                              14
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35